Effective accelerationism
Sources are over 18 months old.
Publication dates and source age
Sources counted: 3
Newest dated source: 2023-11-27
Assessed at this edition's evidence cutoff: 2026-09-15. 18-month boundary: 2025-03-15.
Publication age does not tell us whether a claim is still valid. Reading an old source again does not make its publication date newer. An update date does not establish that the passage we used was updated.
Open in the glossary Reading notes · Structured record
In plain language
A movement favoring faster technological growth and opposing centralized restraint. Its claim that acceleration leads to better outcomes is a philosophical position, not a demonstrated safety guarantee. [1] [2]
Reference this explanation or suggest a correction
Link to this explanation · Suggest a correction · How corrections work
Limits & distinctions
Broader techno-optimism does not imply e/acc membership. Its thermodynamic arguments do not establish that AI is safe. Buterin offers a counterpoint: profit alone does not automatically select beneficial directions for technology. [2] [3]
Reference this explanation or suggest a correction
Link to this explanation · Suggest a correction · How corrections work
A fuller explanation
A movement that treats technological growth, markets and the expansion of intelligence as paths to a better future. Its early writers oppose attempts to centrally slow that process. [1] [2]
Reference this explanation or suggest a correction
Link to this explanation · Suggest a correction · How corrections work
How it relates to the map
Points toward faster development. That does not give every participant the same belief about catastrophic risk. [2]
Reference this explanation or suggest a correction
Link to this explanation · Suggest a correction · How corrections work
Share this page
https://theaiatlas.org/ideas/eacc/
Download a share image · Vector image
Image previews are summaries. Keep the page link so readers can check the evidence.
Sources and what we read
1. what the f* is e/acc
Source is over 18 months old.
Publication dates and source age
Sources counted: 1
Newest dated source: 2022-12-26
Assessed at this edition's evidence cutoff: 2026-09-15. 18-month boundary: 2025-03-15.
Publication age does not tell us whether a claim is still valid. Reading an old source again does not make its publication date newer. An update date does not establish that the passage we used was updated.
Movement self-description. Participants need not share a single risk estimate.
2. Notes on e/acc principles and tenets
Source is over 18 months old.
Publication dates and source age
Sources counted: 1
Newest dated source: 2022-10-31
Assessed at this edition's evidence cutoff: 2026-09-15. 18-month boundary: 2025-03-15.
Publication age does not tell us whether a claim is still valid. Reading an old source again does not make its publication date newer. An update date does not establish that the passage we used was updated.
Date belongs to the repost. Read as a movement's own philosophical claims, not independent scientific validation. Includes adversarial usage of decel.
3. My techno-optimism
Source is over 18 months old.
Publication dates and source age
Sources counted: 1
Newest dated source: 2023-11-27
Assessed at this edition's evidence cutoff: 2026-09-15. 18-month boundary: 2025-03-15.
Publication age does not tell us whether a claim is still valid. Reading an old source again does not make its publication date newer. An update date does not establish that the passage we used was updated.
Read via the author's eth.limo site because vitalik.ca did not load. Introduces defensive, differential and decentralization-focused acceleration. Used for ideas, not a new placement of the author.
Edition and machine-readable evidence
Content version 0.20.0. Evidence cutoff 2026-09-15; this does not mean every source was read on that day.
Pinned complete dataset · Complete evidence page · Agent consumption guide